Brandon Shaffer » Blog Archive » We Must Protect Higher Education
Skip to main content.
April 7th, 2009

We Must Protect Higher Education

A prison is closing. The expansion of full-day kindergarten is halted. State employees’ salaries are frozen. We’ve dipped into the statutory reserve. And Colorado is looking at possibly closing some community colleges if legislators can’t find a way to backfill the suggested $300 million in cuts to higher education.

The cuts in the 2009-10 budget are deep and Senate Democrats are working to protect essential services. At the same time higher education is looking at almost $300 million in cuts, I introduced SB 281, which would spare these serious cuts by transferring a portion of a state entity’s $700 million surplus to the General Fund. SB 281 passed the Senate Appropriations Committee today and will be on second reading on the Senate floor Thursday.  

Cutting $300 million from higher education is entirely unacceptable to me. It would force layoffs at a time when we need to create as many jobs as possible; it would stunt economic growth at a time when we need it most; and it would nearly price out the middle class from attending our universities and colleges. When we must choose between allowing a state entity to sit on a $700 million surplus or closing colleges in Colorado, the choice is clear. We absolutely must preserve post-secondary education.

What SB 281 does:
–Sets up the transfer into the General Fund of almost $500 million in surplus from the state entity, Pinnacol Assurance, which provides workers’ compensation insurance to companies in Colorado.  (That surplus is 6 times over and above what the Division of Insurance says is needed to ensure the solvency of Pinnacol’s operations.)

–Provides new, rigorous oversight in two ways:
1. Provides the State Auditor with enhanced powers to review Pinnacol’s operations and creates an interim committee of the Legislature and charges it with a comprehensive review of the workers’ compensation market in Colorado, including Pinnacol’s executive salary and bonus packages, premium rates, and payments to workers injured on the job.
2. Requires Pinnacol Assurance to pay a dividend to small businesses equal to 5% of Pinnacol Assurance’s surplus.

What SB 281 does NOT do: 
–SB 281 doesn’t affect Colorado’s stable workers’ compensation market.
–SB 281 doesn’t affect Pinnacol’s ability to meet its current or future obligations to injured workers or the families of workers killed on the job.
–SB 281 doesn’t affect Employer’s premiums (In fact, premiums may go down if Pinnacol realizes that, since they have been accumulating a surplus, they can lower rates to a level commensurate with claims payments without losing money). 

The bottom line: Pinnacol is a state entity and the General Assembly can access its excess surplus.
–Pinnacol was created by an act of the legislature, to act as the state’s workers’ compensation insurance provider of last-resort. Pinnacol is a “political subdivision of the state” under 8-45-101 (1), C.R.S., and does not pay state or federal taxes.
–Pinnacol enjoys the privilege of governmental immunity.
–Unlike any private corporation, Pinnacol’s rates are set in state statute. 
–Its Board of Directors is appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. 

Joint Budget Committee members Senators Moe Keller (D-Wheat Ridge), Abel Tapia (D-Pueblo) and Al White (R-Hayden) are co-sponsors of the bill.

Posted by SenatorShaffer in Blog, Budget []

2 Comments »

2 Responses to “We Must Protect Higher Education”

  1. PdProg says:

    This is an interesting question. I heard about it yesterday and now I’ve seen some of the details.

    My gut reaction is “no!”. Pinnacol is functional, not bankrupt, above water and doing its job. Why mess with it?

    You describe that it has 6 times more than it needs for solvency. If that’s *really* true, then as a small business owner, I’m being ripped-off. They should be reducing my rates even more! If they indeed have so much more than they need, then a permanent change should be made to their rate structure. However, I suspect that this claim is true today, and might fluctuate over time. Perhaps someone there realizes that a big catastrophe could occur and create a need for this surplus.

    As a small-business owner, I write checks to Pinnacol on a regular basis, so I think of this as my money being redirected to fund a program that didn’t do as good a job as Pinnacol with their financial planning.

    That said, I think government funding of education *is* critical and I’m all for it. But I’m still not comfortable taking money from such an unrelated source. Indeed, if I was a small business owner who didn’t feel government funding of education was important, I’d be pretty ticked off!

    I would suggest two other courses of action:
    1. Have a 3rd party determine if Pinnacol really has too much surplus and adjust their rate structure if necessary. That way, when their kitty is raided, it is *after* the problem is fixed.
    2. Use the surplus to start funding single payer health care! Much closer to home for most small businesses, and much more in line with where the money is supposed to be spent anyway.

    Enjoy my first political post :)

    -Pete
    Lafayette, CO

  2. SenatorShaffer says:

    Pinnacol has a reserve that is far more than what it needs to cover claims now and in the future. There are three ways Pinnacol could grow a whopping $700 million surplus.

    1. Paying no taxes (If Pinnacol did pay taxes, the state would collect about $40 million a year).
    2. Charging businesses exorbitant premiums.
    3. Denying legitimate claims.

    I carried Senate Bill 281 because none of the above are acceptable. My bill calls for an audit of Pinnacol and an interim committee to investigate why this surplus has grown so excessively. It also requires Pinnacol to give a dividend to all of its small-business policyholders. Companies with fewer than 50 employees will get part of this money returned to them for economic stimulus.

    I think it’s appropriate to issue this call to action to Pinnacol—a state entity sitting on a massive surplus worth $700 million. Pinnacol will remain stable and will be able to maintain or even lower policyholders’ premiums.

    The decision to use these funds—think of them as back taxes—was extremely difficult, but when we must choose between allowing a state entity to retain a $700 million surplus or closing colleges in Colorado, the choice is clear. We absolutely must preserve post-secondary education.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.